# CVE-2025-38334: x86/sgx: Prevent attempts to reclaim poisoned pages

Status: published. Published: 2025-07-10. Updated: 2026-11-05.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

x86/sgx: Prevent attempts to reclaim poisoned pages

TL;DR: SGX page reclaim touches the page to copy its contents to
secondary storage. SGX instructions do not gracefully handle machine
checks. Despite this, the existing SGX code will try to reclaim pages
that it _knows_ are poisoned. Avoid even trying to reclaim poisoned pages.

The longer story:

Pages used by an enclave only get epc_page->poison set in
arch_memory_failure() but they currently stay on sgx_active_page_list until
sgx_encl_release(), with the SGX_EPC_PAGE_RECLAIMER_TRACKED flag untouched.

epc_page->poison is not checked in the reclaimer logic meaning that, if other
conditions are met, an attempt will be made to reclaim an EPC page that was
poisoned.  This is bad because 1. we don't want that page to end up added
to another enclave and 2. it is likely to cause one core to shut down
and the kernel to panic.

Specifically, reclaiming uses microcode operations including "EWB" which
accesses the EPC page contents to encrypt and write them out to non-SGX
memory.  Those operations cannot handle MCEs in their accesses other than
by putting the executing core into a special shutdown state (affecting
both threads with HT.)  The kernel will subsequently panic on the
remaining cores seeing the core didn't enter MCE handler(s) in time.

Call sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() to remove the affected EPC page from
sgx_active_page_list on memory error to stop it being considered for
reclaiming.

Testing epc_page->poison in sgx_reclaim_pages() would also work but I assume
it's better to add code in the less likely paths.

The affected EPC page is not added to &node->sgx_poison_page_list until
later in sgx_encl_release()->sgx_free_epc_page() when it is EREMOVEd.
Membership on other lists doesn't change to avoid changing any of the
lists' semantics except for sgx_active_page_list.  There's a "TBD" comment
in arch_memory_failure() about pre-emptive actions, the goal here is not
to address everything that it may imply.

This also doesn't completely close the time window when a memory error
notification will be fatal (for a not previously poisoned EPC page) --
the MCE can happen after sgx_reclaim_pages() has selected its candidates
or even *inside* a microcode operation (actually easy to trigger due to
the amount of time spent in them.)

The spinlock in sgx_unmark_page_reclaimable() is safe because
memory_failure() runs in process context and no spinlocks are held,
explicitly noted in a mm/memory-failure.c comment.

## Remediation

No remediation reported in collected sources

## Affected products and versions

- Linux / Linux: ≥ 70d3b8ddcd20d3c859676f56c43c7b2360c70266; < 00a88e9ea1b170d579c56327c38f7e8cf689df87 (affected, git); ≥ 70d3b8ddcd20d3c859676f56c43c7b2360c70266; < 62b62a2a6dc51ed6e8e334861f04220c9cf8106a (affected, git); ≥ 70d3b8ddcd20d3c859676f56c43c7b2360c70266; < dc5de5bd6deabd327ced2b2b1d0b4f14cd146afe (affected, git); ≥ 70d3b8ddcd20d3c859676f56c43c7b2360c70266; < 31dcbac94bfeabb86bf85b0c36803fdd6536437b (affected, git); ≥ 70d3b8ddcd20d3c859676f56c43c7b2360c70266; < ed16618c380c32c68c06186d0ccbb0d5e0586e59 (affected, git). Source: CNA: Linux
- Linux / Linux: 5.11 (affected); ≥ 0; < 5.11 (unaffected, semver); ≥ 6.1.142; ≤ 6.1.* (unaffected, semver); ≥ 6.6.95; ≤ 6.6.* (unaffected, semver); ≥ 6.12.35; ≤ 6.12.* (unaffected, semver); ≥ 6.15.4; ≤ 6.15.* (unaffected, semver); ≥ 6.16; ≤ * (unaffected, original_commit_for_fix). Source: CNA: Linux

## Severity and prioritization

- CISA KEV: No listing in collected sources

- EPSS: 0.18% as of 2026-11-05; percentile 7.20%

- SSVC: exploitation none; automatable no; technical impact partial; source ADP: CISA-ADP

- Weaknesses: Not reported

## Exploit evidence

No exploit evidence in collected sources. This is not proof of no exploitation.

## References

- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00a88e9ea1b170d579c56327c38f7e8cf689df87 (CNA: Linux)

- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62b62a2a6dc51ed6e8e334861f04220c9cf8106a (CNA: Linux)

- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dc5de5bd6deabd327ced2b2b1d0b4f14cd146afe (CNA: Linux)

- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31dcbac94bfeabb86bf85b0c36803fdd6536437b (CNA: Linux)

- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed16618c380c32c68c06186d0ccbb0d5e0586e59 (CNA: Linux)

- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00008.html (ADP: CVE)

## Provenance

- CNA: Linux: https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38334; retrieved 2026-11-05; source updated 2026-11-05

- FIRST EPSS: https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2025-38334; retrieved 2026-11-05; source updated Not reported

Revision: d8b8b8d809aea525f4894f344c2b7f70020fa04441ff4f995cc2c409ff1c65e2

Canonical: https://y2.dev/cve/CVE-2025-38334

## Agent and API access

Public CVE pages, Markdown, and JSON are free to read without an account or API key.

- Public catalog: https://y2.dev/cve/index.json. Follow nextCursor with the same search, filters, sort, and limit (1–100). A null cursor marks the end.

- WebMCP: search_cve_disclosures, get_cve_disclosure, get_cve_page_markdown, get_y2_cve_access. Available in compatible browsers.

- Cyber API: https://api.y2.dev/api/v2/cyber/cves and https://api.y2.dev/api/v2/cyber/cves/{cveId}.

- Y2 Pro or Elite: create a workspace API key with the intel:cyber scope and send Authorization: Bearer <Y2_API_KEY>. Setup: https://y2.dev/docs/api/create-key.

- x402: Pay per request without an account or API key. Omit Authorization, read the HTTP 402 PAYMENT-REQUIRED challenge, validate its current requirements, and retry with PAYMENT-SIGNATURE through an authorized payment client. These browser tools never make payments. Guide: https://y2.dev/docs/api/x402.

- OpenAPI: https://y2.dev/api/openapi.yaml. Agent access metadata: https://y2.dev/cve/agent.json.

Collected public records only. Check source status for coverage and freshness.